Dissent vs. Disagreement Essay

In agreement to Daniel J. Boorstins theory, one can recall several events in the history of Americas democracy when contrast paved the path for discussions and solutions merely dissent unaccompanied produced capaciouser separation. Disagreement is the basis for democracy because to each one citizen has a choice to agree or discord and try to make a change. For example, in the 1950s, chocolate-brown v. come on of Education was a product of un abrogateing racket between Americans about whether segregation of schools is native or not. Because of these ongoing debates, the decision was made to end segregation in schools. Similarly, a tragic genocide in Sudan causes many arguments between the American deal as the problem worsens and Americans must decide if they should tempo in. Again, the disagreement of the American democracy acts as its human foot for success and unity, while in Boorstins words, a democracy is kil take by animosity.If in the 1950s, the African Americans chose to go on living with dissension, or deciding to forever feel apart from others, then peradventure America would not have a dumb president today. Because many people disagreed with the harsh racial segregation and discrimination of that time, they were able to act on their opinions and make a change that influenced the future of America. African Americans fought for equality by disagreeing, instead of dissenting, and their efforts are unmingled in todays unsegregated society. In Boornstins words, A person who dissents is by comment in a minority. The African Americans did not want to be know as the lesser minority, but by equal citizens of the American democracy, and the way of behavior they succeeded in making their struggles known was by debating and sway against segregation and discrimination. brown v. Board of Education was an way out of one of their acknowledged actions.Because of this decision, segregation in schools were ultimately deemed unconstitutional. An i mprovement was made in the American democracy, and it was because of the life blood of democracy, which in Boorstins words, is known as Disagreement. Unlike the Brown v. Board of Education Decision, the American government mostly utilise dissension to deal with the genocide in Sudan. nearly call it, The Silent Genocide, because there were many, many, casualties but there was no awareness for the homecoming. Although many recognized that the issue was appalling, few took action and produced debates and disagreements, causing the issue to linger instead of improve. The regular disagreement which a liberal society thrives on was overshadowed by dissension and ignorance.The genocide in Sudan was not able to be fully helped, or helped at all at first off. As Boorstin says, dissension is its democracys cancer and this is evident in this case because Americans chose to dissent and feel apart from this problem, which moreover caused it to get worse. Boorstin recognizes the differences between dissension and disagreement in a way that makes evident that dissent is vain to our societys conflicts whereas disagreement serves as the first step to reaching a solution. While Brown v. Board of education is an example of how disagreement led to improvement, the issue of the genocide in Sudan showed how a great amount of dissension and a lack of discussion, disagreement and knowledge, can turn out to be a democracys cancer.